<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which hat shall I wear today? &#8211; Mediator disciplined (USA)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.amandabucklow.co.uk/2009/07/21/which-hat-shall-i-wear-today-mediator-disciplined-usa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.amandabucklow.co.uk/2009/07/21/which-hat-shall-i-wear-today-mediator-disciplined-usa/</link>
	<description>Putting mediation into business and business into mediation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 22:27:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debra Healy</title>
		<link>http://blog.amandabucklow.co.uk/2009/07/21/which-hat-shall-i-wear-today-mediator-disciplined-usa/comment-page-1/#comment-3618</link>
		<dc:creator>Debra Healy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 00:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amandabucklow.co.uk/?p=593#comment-3618</guid>
		<description>Oops - my post was too long-winded. . .here&#039;s the rest of it though: 
 
I&#039;d be interested in knowing, beyond the disciplinary action of the commission against the mediator, if: a) the mediator may have also been disciplined by the state board of psychologists, and/or 2) if either or both of the parties in this case have pursued a negligence claim against the mediator and/or if there&#039;s any sort of statutory remedy for damages - which then raises the question of mediator liability insurance. 
 
This case should certainly raise a red flag for all mediators: reflect.  If in doubt, seek counsel. 
 
Thanks for your thoughtful consideration of the significance of this case for all mediators. 
 
Debra </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops &#8211; my post was too long-winded. . .here&#039;s the rest of it though: </p>
<p>I&#039;d be interested in knowing, beyond the disciplinary action of the commission against the mediator, if: a) the mediator may have also been disciplined by the state board of psychologists, and/or 2) if either or both of the parties in this case have pursued a negligence claim against the mediator and/or if there&#039;s any sort of statutory remedy for damages &#8211; which then raises the question of mediator liability insurance. </p>
<p>This case should certainly raise a red flag for all mediators: reflect.  If in doubt, seek counsel. </p>
<p>Thanks for your thoughtful consideration of the significance of this case for all mediators. </p>
<p>Debra</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debra Healy</title>
		<link>http://blog.amandabucklow.co.uk/2009/07/21/which-hat-shall-i-wear-today-mediator-disciplined-usa/comment-page-1/#comment-3619</link>
		<dc:creator>Debra Healy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 00:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amandabucklow.co.uk/?p=593#comment-3619</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s difficult to understand how the mediator/psychologist could have failed to perceive the potential impropriety (or potential perception of impropriety) regarding his decision to wear two  professional &quot;hats&quot; in this case.  This would be similar to an attorney/real estate appraiser not only agreeing to represent opposing parties in a real property dispute, but then conducting an appraisal of the subject matter property at the request of one of the parties.   
 
With regard to the breach of confidentiality, I&#039;m wondering if the mediator/respondent in this case sought legal counsel.  I can&#039;t imagine any attorney advising the mediator: 1) not to attempt to quash the subpoena, or 2)  to disclose anything about any mediation in a court document, let alone a sworn affidavit. 
 
Debra </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s difficult to understand how the mediator/psychologist could have failed to perceive the potential impropriety (or potential perception of impropriety) regarding his decision to wear two  professional &quot;hats&quot; in this case.  This would be similar to an attorney/real estate appraiser not only agreeing to represent opposing parties in a real property dispute, but then conducting an appraisal of the subject matter property at the request of one of the parties.   </p>
<p>With regard to the breach of confidentiality, I&#039;m wondering if the mediator/respondent in this case sought legal counsel.  I can&#039;t imagine any attorney advising the mediator: 1) not to attempt to quash the subpoena, or 2)  to disclose anything about any mediation in a court document, let alone a sworn affidavit. </p>
<p>Debra</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Divorce Custody Law - It Can Never Be A Case Of One Rule Fits All - The Blog Planet</title>
		<link>http://blog.amandabucklow.co.uk/2009/07/21/which-hat-shall-i-wear-today-mediator-disciplined-usa/comment-page-1/#comment-3597</link>
		<dc:creator>Divorce Custody Law - It Can Never Be A Case Of One Rule Fits All - The Blog Planet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amandabucklow.co.uk/?p=593#comment-3597</guid>
		<description>[...] Which hat shall I wear today? – Mediator disciplined (USA) &#124; The &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Which hat shall I wear today? – Mediator disciplined (USA) | The &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

