Disappearing Bust of Voltaire by Salvador Dali 1941 - may need to squint to see the ambiguity

Apparently, God did indeed bless the Irish not least with a love of ambiguity which is seen as key to future innovation, according to a recently published research on siliconrepublic.com. Hat tip to @3keyscoach for the link via Twitter this week.

Results from a sample of 117 Irish executives and entrepreneurs indicated a substantial bias towards right-brained cognition when compared with international norms.

Right-brained thinking, towards which the sample showed a preference, includes attributes such as intuition, the ability to make seemingly unrelated connections and tolerance of ambiguity. Ambiguity and the ability to hold incongruent ideas without stress is regarded as inherent to entrepreneurial activity because start-up businesses are often original, innovative ideas that require people who can think laterally and see the bigger picture.

These attributes also appeared frequently in my research into the profile of an effective mediator.

It also reminds me of a story from my very early career. I had just left university and was working in my family’s business. I was given the “deadly” job of credit control. There was a large amount outstanding from a household name and no one had been able to get to the bottom of it and so I saw this as a way to impress my father who was decidedly difficult to impress.

I did hours of research and number crunching and finally, I found where the error was. Rather pleased, I rang the accounts department of said household name company which was in Ireland. I went through the steps with the accounts lady that I had carefully prepared and which I thought would lead her to the same realization. And then they would send me a cheque.

It took about 20 minutes and at the end she said to me in a very calm and sincere tone

Is this money we owe you or money you owe us?

That was not quite the end of the conversation but very nearly. I was floored. When I told my father he simply roared with laughter and retold the story many times. So I guess I got to impress him if not in the way I had intended! I thought that I had not explained myself very well but perhaps it was the Irish love of ambiguity.

For more on entrepreneurship, innovation and creative business skills, check out the Mediation Business Summit

I have been watching the negotiations following our elections with great interest. The potential for politicians to work together in the interests of the country is an exciting prospect if one dares to hope they will do what they say they want to do.

There was a significant wobble in my enthusiasm during most of yesterday and by last night I felt a sense of gloom return. Like many, I thought Nick Clegg was acting very honourably until the point it was revealed that the LibDems had started secret discussions with the Labour Party. I was disappointed and it felt important to notice that. Someone once said that ‘a cynic is a disappointed optimist’.

It was important because Clegg seemed to be not doing what he said he would do (put the formation of a stable government first) and doing what he said he would not do (make Proportional Representation a deal breaker) and it seemed a little early in the day for changing minds and empty promises. OK so what’s new about that?

Thankfully, some mature minds in the Labour Party put a stop to that diversion on principle and we have an agreement. Credit where it is due for making that call. Even so, I don’t think the events of yesterday will be forgotten by the press and the political commentators. Arguably, we do now have an arrangement which reflects the votes cast last week.  A government with a decent majority but a tempered mandate and an opposition to provide checks and balances. This was achieved without a drastic change to the voting system. PR has a lot of drawbacks despite the appearance of a fairer system.

The challenge now is for the two parties in government to continue in a sensible and measured negotiations on a daily basis without displaying too much compromise or watering down in the decision making. That is important because we are going to need some tough and difficult decisions over the next weeks and months.

I do not want to see them squabbling; I don’t want to hear backbiting or sneaky briefings against colleagues; I don’t want to hear anymore stories about self-interested and self-serving activities. I want to see them work together, fiercely debate the issues that matter and demonstrate their first interest is public service. Only then can we can hope to maintain our independence and look after our citizens in order to be a strong member of the European Community. The price of not being a strong member is to lose the right to make independent choices, as Greece has recently discovered, and makes a mockery of any voting system if it comes down to ‘he who pays the piper, calls the tune.’

To that end this new government could do worse than have the assistance of experienced mediators working alongside keeping the communication and momentum going and marshaling options and choices.

The third eye, perspective, call it what you will, could make all the difference in helping the coalition build strength and trust. The most important of those being trust.

The benefits could be far reaching. Such a lead from the top would give encouragement to companies and organisations to follow and start a new era of agreement.

It is easy to disagree. The act of disagreeing can be addictive. It can also be confused with winning.

Added link: Law Gazette

I found this terrific interview by Katie Couric of CBS News with Ellen Galinsky on a new book about life skills for children called Mind in the Making: The Seven Essential Life Skills Every Child Needs. Happily, the ability to resolve conflict is included (you will find the reference at about 32 minutes). It also echoes my own research into the skills of a mediator which place competence in the skills Galinsky talks about at the top of the list.

The book has been called “the best thing since Emotional Intelligence”. In the book, Galinsky identifies 7 life skills:

1. Focus and Self Control – pay attention and the ability to inhibit the desire to go on automatic.
2. Perspective Taking – knowing what others think, feel. Empathy is part of that but Ellen goes further to include the Theory of Mind (understanding what is going on in other people’s minds).
3. Communicating – the ability to put aside your own thoughts in order to understand the other, knowing how your words will be heard and know how to frame your own words so that you will be understood.
4. Making Connections – the ability to see the connections and the ability to make unusual connections which is the basis of creativity
5. Critical Thinking – looking for valid and accurate information – how to challenge and discern what is right and useful.
6. Taking on Challenges – resilience, risk taking, having a growth mindset, not giving up when that would be the easy thing to so.
7. Self Directed, Engaged Learning – curiosity, “I don’t know everything” mindset, I am not the expert, humility.

The things that stand out for me in making my own connections from this interview to my work as a mediator is that I notice the lack of these skills in my work and it is increasingly common with younger people. This suggests a change in the education system which may have something to do with the narrow focus of education to achieve higher levels of literacy and numeracy and the emphasis on measuring those to meet political agendas. The laudable intention seems to have had unintended consequences.

Despite all the books and courses on communicating skills, mindfulness, collaboration, my experience is that they are expressed less often in practice. Most of all, I notice how difficult it is for people to be empathetic as they struggle with their conviction about their rights or for them to be curious or to make unusual connections unless they are coached and encouraged to do so. I also agree with Galinsky when she says in the interview that it is never too late to learn these skills. They are essential skills not just for life but for dealing with the challenges that face us from the workplace to our relationships with other countries.

So to my mind whether we are mediator, lawyer, manager or employee we all need to

1. Show up and pay attention.
2. Put aside your own thoughts in order to understand the other and make a habit of seeing other perspectives.
3. Be humble and curious because whenever we start to think that we know best, or there is nothing to learn, we fail to inhibit the desire to ‘go on automatic’.
4. Practice giving praise and encouragement but not about the people themselves but rather on the approaches and strategies they use.

I think giving praise and encouragement to “grown ups’ is one of the most difficult things to do well without sounding patronising or inferring labels. Appreciation of effort and outcomes is a huge part of keeping people engaged and it requires real skill to do that.

Here’s the video.

Watch CBS News Videos Online
Ellen Galinsky, president and co-founder of the Families in Work Institute speaks to Katie Couric about her new book, “Mind in the Making: The Seven Essential Life Skills Every Child Needs.”

I really look forward to preparing for and participating in our Cafe Mediate podcasts because it makes me re-view my assumptions and opinions especially those I may have previously given a lot of thought to and even written or spoken about. I really look forward to “meeting up” with my colleagues on line and I find each session provokes reflection particularly on the points which raised differences between us.

At the end of our latest Cafe Mediate podcast, I was asked what were my personal views on certification. My answer was that I had been against it for many years but that lately I had started to think there might be some benefits. To be honest, I am surprised at this shift in my views because the arguments against certification are still very compelling.

Like my fellow Cafe Mediator, Diane Levin, who has since written more on the subject in her recent post at Mediation Channel, I have noticed some changes in the market over the last 12 months. These changes have lead me to think resistance to certification might be counterproductive but deep down I still think that certification, regulation, call it what you will, will not answer the real questions we should be addressing about where the practice of mediation is going. I think nearly everyone agrees that by now it should be the first choice for the great majority of people in resolving disputes, simply because it works and because the alternative is uncertain, costly and generally unsatisfactory.

Shortly after the podcast I read a brilliant post on certification by Michael Port who has really put his finger on the key issues around “why bother?” It often takes an independent “third eye” to see other perspectives. This is what mediation is about, after all.

Michael Port writes about the value of certification generally and brings a really pertinent question sharply into focus for me: will certification mean more business for mediators?

This goes straight to the heart of the matter. What if it is not the lack of certification or comfort for end users that has got in the way of the market growing but the fact that there is focus on shaping the profession and not on building the business? What if underneath all this there talk about standards there it is more to do with identity and the enduring divide between the ‘profession’ label and the ‘business’ label? I can’t speak about the rest of the world but here in the UK there is a snobbery about professions compared with ‘business’. What if this is more about thinking that if you are part of a profession then you will get more business. Qualifications = higher prices? Profession = regular work.

Is it possible that mediators are suffering from an identity crisis based on the perception of the difference between a profession and business? Do we want to be professionals in practice, professionals in business, professional consultants, part of an Association, Institute, Academy, panel, chambers? Are we seeking to professionalize the practice of mediation to deal with a need to belong? I think professionalism is actually about trust and being part of a professional group sends a message that we have somehow passed a ‘trust’ exam. Most of the professions require that members be trustworthy and ethical.

What if it was more a question for some of being part of an existing profession and not wanting to give up that status?

Panels, chambers, associations have all been used as business models and none of them have worked in increasing the business but they have succeeded in dividing up the available pie. It is ironic that we talk about increasing the pie with our customers and then fall short in doing the same for ourselves.

The brilliant thing is that we have today some of the best tools ever to build fellowship and community and they are the tools of social media. We have a chance to build communities with a brand, benefits and an outreach that can surpass the membership of of any established profession and reach the people who need our skills without the gatekeepers who may have got in the way of the growth of this great service offering. In my next post, I will talk about why mediators need to get into social media.

If we had been more successful in building our business would we be so concerned about “certification”?

If you haven’t listened to the latest Cafe Mediate podcast yet then you will find it listed on iTunes or on Libsyn. Do leave a comment.

The latest in our “caffeinated conversations” Mediator Training and Preparation can be found at the following locations:

Mediation training and preparation podcast page

Subscribe in iTunes

Subscribe via RSS

Subscribe via email

Podcast site for all episodes and subscription options

Thanks to Diane, Tammy, Jeff and Vickie for a great conversation which could have lasted all night. I look forward to the next which will be on the gritty subject of credentials for mediators.